The topic of people being innocent
or guilty by association is a difficult question to answer. There are many different definitions of makes
a person guilty. In the article, it
talks about the “ordinary Germans” during the Holocaust. These were the people who were not Nazis and
knew what was happening and let it happen.
Dr. Victor Capesius was one of them.
He was recruited to be a doctor at a Concentration camp. He did not necessarily believe in the Nazi cause,
but was intimidated into submission.
When he saw his former Jewish patients coming off the trains, he simply
went along with orders and sent them marching to their deaths. Although he was not the one coming up with
the direct order to commit the murder, he was just as guilty as the
Hitler. This article gives a new insight
into many of the consciences of the character of Macbeth. For the murder of
Banquo in Act 3, Macbeth has three servants commit the murder for him. Those servants are just as responsible for
the murder as Macbeth. First off, they were
the ones that actually committed the murder.
They had the dagger that ended his life.
Macbeth, ultimately, should be the guiltiest because he planned the
murder and theoretically killed him, among others.
Another
aspect of this issue is the bystanders who know about the injustice, but do
nothing. This was an issue in the
Holocaust. There were many “ordinary
Germans” who knew about the concentration camps, but simply chose to stay
silent and continue to let those people suffer.
In Macbeth, one bystander is Lady Macbeth. Although she plans the murder of Duncan, she doesn’t
plan Banquo’s murder, but does nothing to stop it from happening. In both senses, those people owed it to the
victims, to humanity, and to themselves to speak up and put a stop to something
horrible happening or continuing to happen.
The bystanders are guilty, but not in the same sense as the murders or
bad people. They are guilty of not
having the courage to take a stand, no matter the consequences. The innocent people who didn’t ask for these
problems to be thrust upon them do have a duty report injustices. People can combat evil and maintain their
convictions. Murder or wrong doing is
never the answer in combating anyone’s so called evil. Many people think something is evil that is
not evil at all. Hitler thought the Jews
were evil and Macbeth thought that Duncan and Banquo were evil but they weren’t. Real evils, though, can be defeated through
more human ways, such as people doing the right thing because they are
motivated to or people changing their habits because someone helped them see
the error of their ways. The world would
be a much better place if the innocent bystanders stopped being afraid and
stood up for the injustices that they have seen happen in their lives. These people have the potential to change
what will happen in the world, just as some person must have done it for the
Holocaust and hopefully, as the play progresses, someone does it for
Macbeth.
Hi Katie,
ReplyDeleteNice response to the writing prompt. I liked your discussion of how people can mistake something for evil. If we think of evil existing in evil actions alone, then it's people's behavior toward an object, animal, or other person that can be either evil or good. I also liked your hopeful wish that someone in our play will eventually step up and do the right thing. We shall see! You did well to talk about the article and connect it to the play and your argument. Good job.